And one of my last meetings with Hoan Ton-That, before I was done with the book, they had just crawled Flickr. They seem to be pretty good at targeting places that are likely to have faces. But yeah, it seems like pretty wide out there - news sites, employer sites. So, I mostly see it through when I see an example of a search, whether they run it on me or I see it show up in a police investigation. They’re a private company, so I can’t send them a public records request and find out what all their sources are. Unfortunately, they’re not a government actor. It’s such a range that I really think we need to think hard about this and not just let it slip in and become ubiquitous or become normalized without setting up some guardrails. What if we start having a technology like this running all the time on all the cameras, tracking us everywhere we go? It could be used in chilling ways against protestors or to gather damning information about a political opponent. And we look at China as an example of that. It can be really damaging when it goes wrong or if the police trust the face match too much - not to mention what happens if it starts getting rolled out more widely. Louisiana had to hire lawyers to clear all this up. He got arrested the day after Thanksgiving, put in jail for a week, awaiting extradition.

It was basically purse theft in Louisiana. I know of at least one person who has been misidentified as a criminal suspect because of Clearview AI. But I think we need to ask ourselves, are we comfortable with this database of probably hundreds of millions of people, probably you and me? Should we all be in the lineup every time the police are trying to solve a crime, whether it’s shoplifting or murder? And if they are going to use facial recognition technology, what are the rules? Do you need to get a warrant to search a database like this? Should every officer just have this on their phone and use it whenever they want? What do you do after you get a match? What kind of crime should you use it for?Įven if we just accept that it’s a useful tool, there are still so many conversations we have to have. I’ve talked to a lot of officers who, yeah, they’ve solved crimes with Clearview AI as a starting point. They should never arrest somebody based on a Clearview match alone and that they need to do more investigating.” I think, for us as a society, there’s just a lot to evaluate here. Clearview definitely pushes that onus to police departments in saying, “We’re just providing the technology for them to use.

Italy clearview ai million data deleted